Flawed thinking: Green hysterics

jonFullerDotOrgJon Fuller advertise his website on his election literature. His sole article (so far) is an exercise in flawed thinking.

The climate changes, indisputable. Some 11,000 years ago we saw the end of the most recent ice age – the world has been warming up since then. This is not a consistent warming up, the mean temperature for our planet actually fluctuates quite a bit.

Some of the warmest years on record have occurred recently, and some of this will be down to the natural climate fluctuations. Some of this will, though, be a by-product of man’s activities.

According to Southend West’s Green candidate, Jon Fuller, there is certainty in the science. He is sure of what he believes, and his hyperbole brooks no argument.

I think he is blinkered. I am an environmentalist, and I do think we should be doing more to arrest global warming, but I think people like Jon damage our prospects. He comes across as irrational.

The science is inexact and opinion varies. However, I have always argued that in of itself, despite climate change, environmentalism is good. Being respectful of the natural world and being careful with scarce resources strikes me as sensible .

There are a whole host of reasons for poverty and starvation, and most of these are down to world of unfairness. We produce enough food to feed everyone, but tied to global capitalism we are unable to fairly distribute it. Whilst we throw away huge amounts of food, others starve.

Using the holocaust to boost one’s arguments is revolting. Whatever Mr Fuller thinks of mass consumption, consumers are not Nazis. Neither are governments merely seeking to make their people prosper.

People want choice. People want to travel. People like electronic toys, and all sorts of consumer items. People want their children to be more prosperous than them. Green Party policy attempts to shut much of this down. I think we need to strike a balance. For instance, making aircraft greener has got to be the way, not banning them.

The denial of austerity (which I do not like, but I accept that we have to tackle debt) is one thing; to talk of shrinking GDP and yet promising all sorts of expenditure is primary school politics.

We have to be greener, and the only way this is going to happen is with a Labour Government. Making daft and exaggerated comments only discredits arguments for greener politics. I like passion in politics, but I also like discipline when it comes to making one’s arguments.


A confederacy of indulgences; Belfairs Green

belfairsGreenAnother Green Party leaflet, another identikit personal statement. Barry Bolton, a former Parliamentary candidate, ought to be able to construct his own declaration.

Labour did created the National Health Service. It is also the only Government that ever properly funds it. The Green Party are not going to win many, if any seats, yet they could deprive the one party who can save the NHS from being able to do this.

If Jon Fuller really believes is “is our last chance to save the NHS” then he should be encouraging everyone to vote for me.

Encouraging voters to indulge in politics of the money tree is to conspire to ignore reality. Whilst some Green policies are laudable, some seem to fly in the face of common sense. I also find the hyperbole here utterly unconvincing, and the messianic ramblings by Mr Fuller would have you believe the Green Party can defy electoral arithmetic and somehow deliver victory for Jon and his leader, Natalie Bennett.

I would also add that belonging to an organisation like the European Union is only going to make efforts to combat any damage to the natural environment a lot easier to achieve. It is an irony that the climate-change obsessed party seeks to damage our chances of making the world greener by offering a referendum, which is not only distracting but also offers the possibility of our exit.

A Green vote will only make it easier for the Conservatives or UKIP to get elected

Greenleaflet01The Green Party have been leafleting, this one has been going through letterboxes in Westborough and Blenheim Park wards recently.

This is headed ‘there is a better way’ – true, but the Green way (if Brighton is anything to go by) is not it.

There is much in Green Party policy that I can applaud, but there are some issues that I stand some distance from them. We have to protect the environment, for instance, but this does not have to come without economic growth and improving prosperity.

I am not keen on the idea of a referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU. Whilst the EU is in need of reform, exit would make us less safe and poorer.

Whilst a redistributive element to taxation policy is something most socialists would advocate, I am not sure about a wealth tax. If this a tax on assets such as money held in banks then this can quite easily be avoided.

If voters want many of these policies though, they would be better to vote for a party that can actually implement them. A vote for a Green candidate often allows the reverse of what is intended; in Kursaal ward last year, for example, Green votes allowed a UKIP councillor to sneak in, past the Labour candidate.

For a fairer and more equal society, and one that looks after the environment, vote Labour. A Green vote will only make it easier for the Conservatives or UKIP to get elected.

The ugly Green Party agenda – standing for no other reason than to stop me

Jon Fuller is the Green Party candidate for Southend West. Until recently he had two Facebook accounts; one as himself, and another as Jon Fullergreenparty. He also liked to add comments to his fellow Green Party Parliamentary Candidate’s posts (Simon Cross); these comments have also seemed to disappear.

For those who did not have the opportunity to enjoy Mr Fuller’s prose, I reproduce extracts below.

By 2010 the most extraordinary thing had happened – Labour had drifted so far away from its roots that it sat on the centre-right of British politics, with the Lib-Dems positioned as the party of the centre-left. So, here in Southend West, with our first past the post system, it made sense for people like me to vote Lib-Dem. Plus, in Peter Welch (who stood in 2010), we were offered an eco-aware candidate who understood that Southend was the wrong place to build a busy regional airport.
But, in 2015, the landscape will be very different – Labour has selected Julian Ware-Lane, Peter cannot stand this time and the Lib-Dem vote is likely to collapse. The electorate has one important function to perform beyond the obvious role of casting a vote on the ballot paper – we have to punish a political party if it promises one thing and delivers another. That is what the Lib-Dems have done – they positioned themselves as the main left of centre party but delivered a hard right agenda. The age of austerity brought a vicious assault upon the living standards of the great mass of us, but the super-rich became a lot richer. We expect that of the Conservatives, not of progressive politicians. So it is entirely understandable that the Lib-Dems will lose millions of votes in 2015.
I am now so disillusioned with the Labour Party that it would have been difficult for me to ‘pinch my nose’ and vote for the party in 2015, but the selection of Julian Ware-Lane makes that choice impossible. For me Julian represents everything that is wrong in the Labour Party. I could never vote for him. Not only does he support the climate busting expansion of Southend Airport but he has campaigned against speed bumps in our incredibly densely populated town – where children are particularly vulnerable. The patch closest to his home (and mine), that apparently causes him so much consternation, is the set of bumps outside the three high schools and close to Our Lady of Lourdes and Darlinghurst primary schools.

I have lived in this constituency for nearly 40 years and spent over 25 years of that time campaigning on road safety. Many people will have seen reports on the campaigns I have organised in the local press, heard me on radio or seen me on TV. In the 1990s, when the UK killed more child pedestrians on our roads than any other EU nation, I campaigned to have speed limits around town reduced and ran a national campaign “Speedlimit” to force politicians to stop killing and maiming so many children. In the mid-90s we made a breakthrough, securing a package of measures that would protect children. Between 1998 and 2007 we saved the lives of 520 children – mostly by installing speed bumps. I am sure everyone will understand why, with that background, I cannot allow the Labour Party to reverse those gains and why I must stand for election in opposition to Julian Ware-Lane.

So, let me be clear, I know what the outcome of the election in this constituency will be; but I will not allow the electorate of this town to only be offered different shades of brutality on the ballot paper.

I didn’t want my political affiliations to dilute my eco-work but, when Labour chose Julian Ware-Lane as their candidate, I realised I had to act. It is possible that we could have been offered a good Lib-Dem candidate but Peter Welch wasn’t able to stand, and I couldn’t take the chance that someone in the Graham Longley mould would be selected. If I was going to stop Julian, I had to knuckle down & get on with it. It is ghastly. I hate it. But duty calls.

David Amess and I went through a bad patch during the 1990s, when the Tories were attacking Labour over its road safety strategy but since then we have worked well together. David attended and spoke at two meetings I organised (the No Estuary Airport Campaign and the Energy Bill Revolution) and when the Southend Airport scheme went ahead, he did at least show respect & sympathy to those who suffered real misery as a result of expansion; something constituents cannot expect from Julian Ware-Lane.

Perhaps Labour could apologise for Julian’s crass campaign against speed bumps around the schools and assure the public that the party will ditch any candidate who fails to campaign to protect children from the greatest threat they face?

While Labour members and Labour supporters refuse to apologise and make amends, those of us who are driven to protect the vulnerable have an overriding duty to stand up for those who cannot protect themselves. That is why I joined the Green Party and that is why I very reluctantly decided I had to stand against the brutality of the local Labour Party’s policies.

When the Green Party announced its candidates for the East of England’s seaside towns  they included this:

Elsewhere in Essex, Simon Cross was chosen as the Green Party’s candidate for Rochford and Southend East and Jon Fuller was selected as the candidate for the neighbouring constituency of Southend West.

Jon Fuller has been associated with the campaign to stop expansion of Southend Airport and to oppose the Thames Estuary airport scheme. He said:
“I am incredibly privileged to have been asked to stand for the Green Party and will fight a campaign on the issues the other parties are terrified of touching”.

I am not sure what issues he thinks I am terrified of touching, and it certainly does not include the question of who removed a large part of Jon Fuller’s presence from Facebook?