Zygological zygnomic zoilism

Conceptions at under 16 (Conception rate per 1,000 women)

2012 2011 2010 2009
Peterborough UA 6.6 6.6 8.0 8.7
Southend-on-Sea UA 6.5 9.4 6.2 8.2
Thurrock UA 6.3 7.7 6.3 6.6
England and Wales 5.6 6.1 6.8 7.2
Bedford UA 5.1 3.0 8.2 6.1
Suffolk 5.0 5.4 5.3 4.5
Luton UA 5.0 6.9 6.2 2.9
Essex 4.9 6.2 5.0 5.7
Norfolk 4.4 5.4 5.9 6.2
Central Bedfordshire UA 4.2 6.7 6.5 6.5
Cambridgeshire 3.4 3.9 4.1 6.1
Hertfordshire 3.3 4.0 3.9 4.4


The data is the table above was extracted from the Conception Statistics for England and Wales, 2012. This is the most current information available.

The Office for National Statistics produces all sorts of fascinating data. These are open to all sorts of interpretations, but they are facts. This data, for instance, about under-age conception rates could generate all sorts of arguments over causes and solutions, but the numbers themselves are undeniable.

My interest is in how my home town compares, and again it compares unfavourably with regional and national averages. However it is a large town in the region that does not have many large towns (Southend-on-Sea is second largest behind Luton), and you would imagine that this sort of data would show urban areas with higher numbers than rural ones.

I am not prepared to be at all judgemental regarding young pregnancies, but I do want to ensure that sex education, advice, and contraceptives are freely available to all, and that the incidence of young conception is not linked to abuse, poverty, or ignorance.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: