Shoeburyness

shoeburynessPerhaps the most interesting aspect of recent elections in Shoeburyness is the missing Liberal Democrats – they have not put anyone up there since 2010. Whilst they may claim it is a deliberate strategy I am not convinced. It indicates, to my mind anyway, that they are struggling in the east of Southend.

The last decade has seen a decline in Labour support in a ward that was once seen as a target for us. Our vote share has barely moved since the General Election, in contrast to many other places, which suggests that it will take a few years to rebuild our support base.

What is also noticeable is that the backdrop of a national election does damage the Independents chances – 2010 saw a Conservative victory. 2014 will see another national election (those for the European Parliament) and Tory hopes must be that this will be enough to secure victory. There will be UKIP to factor in, if they stand here. Their sole appearance in Shoeburyness was in 2010 where they received 5.2% of the votes cast.

A Tory hold is possible, but likeliest outcome is an Independent gain here in twelve months’ time.

A look back at last Thursday’s full council meeting

Perhaps the two most notable things that happened at Thursday full council meeting were the vote on the future of the residential care homes and the verbal attacks on Cllr Alex Kaye, but I will come to these shortly.

This blog could not record everything that goes on at the council, but I will attempt a brief summary as best as I can recollect. I took no notes and so apologise if something crucial is left out.

I wondered whether the meeting would have a moment’s reflection on the passing of Margaret Thatcher; I would not have minded this, but it did not. There were a number of questions to the council, including a pair from Cllr Marimuthu Velmurugan who wanted all chair and vice-chair positions to be filled by Conservative councillors. This was a not very subtle swipe at his former Independent colleagues, although there are also chairs and vice-chairs in the Labour and Liberal Democrat groups.

Cllr Velmurugan now sits very close to the Conservative councillors in the chamber and I wonder whether he is considering joining them at some point.

I asked two questions:

I am mindful that there is a review of the Victoria Gateway shared space about to start (or started). I know that the Portfolio holder for Public Protection, Waste and Transport is aware of the petition calling for this space to be made safe, and the recent accident involving a bus and a disabled pedestrian. I am unsure whether he has had the number of complaints against this shared space that I have, although he will be aware of my views. I also remind him of a number of reports in the local media. Can he assure me that pedestrian safety will be paramount when evaluating the outcome of the review and when considering what remedial action will be required?

The Centre For Cities recent publication, Cities Outlook 2013, shows Southend as being 61st out of 64 when comparing residents with high level qualifications. The percentage of the working age population with NVQ4 and above for 2011 was 19.6% – this compares to the national average of 32.9%. Less than a fifth of our working population holds a degree or more. If the Portfolio holder for Children and Learning still believes that education in our town is a “jewel in the crown” would he care to share what kind of jewel he believes it to be?

I was content with the response to my first question, and my follow-up was to ask that the bus companies be included in discussions. The reply I received for the second question smacked of complacency and gave me the impression that the portfolio holder was happy with the current situation vis-a-vis education in Southend. Interestingly, later on, in a debate on education, the deputy leader of the council, Cllr Lamb, appeared to contradict what his colleague had to say.

Council Leader, Cllr Nigel Holdcroft, at one point intent on writing a campaign plan for us, seemed predisposed to objecting to my colleagues holding his administration to account. I can only imagine that our effective and coherent campaigning is getting to him, and his whining is all the encouragement we will need to keep it up.

I had had conversations with Unison members in the run-up to this meeting and to be honest I was not looking forward to a vote on the future of the residential care homes. My position on the cuts is well-known, but I am determined not to be either opportunistic or unrealistic, and so am aware that I have to face some uncomfortable decisions. In the end the vote was about the forthcoming consultation. I have not sat in on any of the scrutiny meetings on this or been privy to information circulated to the working panel, and so I deferred to my colleague, Cllr David Norman, on this subject. Without pre-judging the consultation process, it does look likely that the Priory home will close, and that Delaware will be rebuilt.

Consistency is not Cllr Martin Terry’s strong suite. He, and a number of his colleagues, are complaining long and loud about Cllr Alex Kaye’s defection to the Conservative Party (she is in fact returning to the party), yet uttered not a word when Cllr Ric Morgan defected from the Liberal Democrats to joined their disparate band. Whilst Cllr Kaye’s somewhat monosyllabic answers at one point did her no favours, she at least did not descend to the sometime childish displays by her former Independent colleagues. I will happily take Cllr Kaye to task over her support for cuts, etc, and I hope I will manage to do this by tackling the issues, not by personal attacks. Since nine of the Independents voted for the Conservative budget I cannot really understand what they are complaining about.

Westborough

WestboroughThe political picture in Westborough is an interesting one. It is also one that is changing.

The last decade has seen this ward become an Independent homeland, and that looks set to change. The rise and fall of the Independents has largely been of Dr Marithmu Velmurugan’s making, with Martin Terry clinging to his coat-tails.

In 2000, the last year of the old boundaries in Southend (when there were just thirteen wards) Westborough was won by the Liberal Democrats, who took 43.8% of the vote. Labour trailed in in third (and last) place with 24.3%. Labour usually managed a string second in the ward that had become a Liberal stronghold over the years.

(I was born and lived the first sixteen years of my life in this ward. My GP was Dr Lubel, whose wife, Mary, represented the ward for the Liberals for a long time.)

2001, against the backdrop of a General Election and the boundary changes which created seventeen wards and saw all-up elections, saw Dr Velmurugan and Teresa Merrison returned as Labour councillors, together with the Liberal Democrat Jean Sibley.

Martin Terry, in his first stab at the seat, came eleventh (and last), just behind Mark Flewitt (also standing as an Independent). Two years earlier the chameleon-like Flewitt, as a Labour candidate, came within four votes of victory.

Terry’s persistence paid off two years later, when he topped the 2003 poll. He was the first Independent councillor, although it was only twelve months before their number was doubled.

In 2004 Cllr Dr Velmurugan was all set to be the Labour candidate. He completed his nomination papers and submitted them, and these included lavish praise for the Labour Party and Government. Within two weeks he had resigned from the party, and announced his intention to stand as an Independent.

I had been discreetly approached with a view to my challenging Dr Velmurugan for the Westborough nomination. (Labour internal procedures do not allow the automatic re-selection of councillors as candidates next time around, although this, in practise, is what happens in many instances.) I was uncertain whether to challenge Dr Velmurugan, but was persuaded. I then withdrew; whilst I think such challenges are perfectly acceptable I had decided to expend my energies elsewhere (I was already thinking about Parliamentary selections at this point). However, the day after my informing the Westborough Labour Party that I would not be challenging for the selection I was told of Dr Velmurugan desertion and thus was asked to re-consider. To cut a long story short, I stood, came fourth, and soundly thrashed I registered Labour’s second worst result of the last decade.

Since then the Independent’s support has been slowly ebbing away, but they have held on largely because the ward has become a four-way marginal. In 2010 (another general Election backdrop) a mere 4.3% separated the top four candidates. The 2010 result showed the dangers for the Indies – any rise in turnout sees them struggle as they came third here. 2014 and 2015 will see national elections held at the same time as the locals, and they will struggle to make an impact.

Add into the mix the civil war that broke out in the residents’ association, Cllr Dr Velmurugan’s espoused Conservative loyalties, and Cllr Terry suggestion of a chicken run, then it is clear that this ward is no longer a given for the Indies.

The Conservatives, for whom Westborough is their worst Southend ward, came within 0.4% of success in 2010, showing that anything is possible in this most marginal of wards in the Borough. The Liberal Democrats won that year with 23.8% (winning with less than a quarter of the votes is notable enough), yet by 2012, a mere twenty-four months later, they got a mere 5.4% and came sixth and last.

It would be miraculous for Cllr Paul Collins to retain his seat next year, although he will take some comfort from the volatile nature of the ward and the fact that he will have had four years to ingrain himself in the minds of the voters. The official Independent Group (as opposed to the unofficial Independents, which exposes the sham of their set-up) will put up a fight, and Labour will be expecting another strong performance following on from their narrow second-place last year.

I am hoping for a Labour victory, and this is not blind prejudice. The evidence is there, although I am aware that a week is a long time in politics, a year an eternity.

Wasteful-on-Sea; the portfolio holder for paperclips awaits his windfall

I think it worthwhile reproducing some of the correspondence I have had with the council regarding the re-issued blue food-waste caddies.

My bits are in red, the council’s in blue.

Has my dodgy memory forgotten about the consultation regarding the issue of more blue food waste caddies, or am I correct in thinking that this consultation never happened?

I can advise that the Council was successful in receiving funding from the Department for Communities and Local and Government (DCLG) which allocated money specifically to support weekly collections and recycling schemes.  The delivery of new food containers and liners to residents has been fully funded by the DCLG and is expected to increase recycling whilst reducing overall waste disposal costs.  As there has been no material change to the collection service in its essence (the enhancement is one of adding value, where residents are receiving the same service but with the added advantage of receiving free compostable food waste liners) the costs and resources required for a full consultation with residents was, therefore, not deemed necessary or part of the bid requirement.

We have, however, conducted a number of surveys to understand customers behaviour and opinions related to the food waste service, and the cost of compostable liners were deemed to be a key barrier to participation in the scheme. Participation monitoring exercises have also substantiated that the food waste scheme required additional focus, and this funding provided the ideal opportunity to do so. Not only can the primary barrier to participation be addressed, the costs incurred from disposing of food waste to landfill can be reduced as the scheme is used to its full potential.

When were councillors consulted on the distribution of these caddies?

It would be right to say that we have not undertaken any specific consultation on the distribution of the new food caddies etc primarily because it is just an enhancement of our existing waste collection service and is funded from a govt grant specifically for that purpose.

However in the past we have undertaken a lot of consultation on our recycling service and on our food waste recycling – in regard to the latter the most important piece of feedback we’ve received is that residents would prefer to use the decomposable bags rather than newspaper etc. When the scheme was introduced we were not able to cover the cost of proving free bags and our residents tell us this is a disincentive to use the service.

You write: We have, however, conducted a number of surveys to understand customers behaviour and opinions related to the food waste service, and the cost of compostable liners were deemed to be a key barrier to participation in the scheme.

Can you provide details of these surveys?.

Please find a list of past consultation undertaken relevant to the food waste collection service.

Main Survey’s

  • Southchurch High Performance Area Door stepping report low performing areas January 2010
  • Southend’s food waste collection Service – exploring residents’ attitudes & behaviours Briefing Paper, July 2010
  • Southend Waste & Recycling Residents’ Survey, 2010 Briefing Paper, October 2010
  • Southchurch High Performance Area Door-stepping Report March 2011
  • Southend Borough Council – food Waste Trial Report December 2007
**********************************************************

Two things stand out in this conversation as far as I am concerned.

Firstly, your elected representatives are not consulted if it is an “enhancement … of our existing … service”. You could scrap the council chamber if you describe everything as an enhancement.

Secondly, the most recent ‘main survey’ was two years ago. One could ask about the delay (weren’t recycling targets important in 2011?) I would also wonder just how representative a two-year old survey is (especially one restricted to Southchurch).

I think a pot of money was grabbed just because it was available, regardless of whether it really was worth having. I think someone wants to explain to the council and its ruling administration that wherever the money has come from it is ultimately derived from tax-payers wallets.

If funding for paperclips ever becomes available I expect every household will be given a supply. Meanwhile, we tax-payers wonder why we have less police on our streets.

Thorpe

Vote share in Thorpe ward, 2001 - 2012

Vote share in Thorpe ward, 2001 – 2012

News reaches me that Alex Kaye is to become the third Southend-on-Sea councillor to change allegiance in the current Civic Year. It is getting rather confusing trying to keep up with whom is actually in the Independent Group, but I think I am right in stating that they number nine. The Conservatives are now a majority administration.

It will be an interesting test of Cllr Kaye’s personal popularity in her ward next year when she is up for re-election, especially when considering the statistics that show how this formerly rock-solidly safe Tory ward is in thrall to the Independents. Even against the backdrop of a General Election the Tories could not break through, and so I can only assume that Cllr Kaye either suspects that there will be no Independent candidate to oppose her, or that she is more popular than her party in Thorpe. This is an all the more brave move when considering the falling ratings for the Tories, and the prospect of UKIP out-performing them next year.

This now makes nine of the seventeen wards in town having a mixed population as regards to party allegiance, and reflects the changing political picture in the town. The chamber now has 26 Conservatives, 9 Independent Group, 9 Liberal Democrat, 6 Labour, and Dr Velmurugan.

Perhaps the most curious statistic in recent years is that the Tory vote share in 2011 was less than Labour’s in 2001. This leads me to speculate as to whether our rising fortunes will, at some time in the not too distant future, see us overtaking the Tories in Thorpe. Far-fetched? Maybe, but Tory HQ cannot read the recent election results and feel comfortable whilst doing so. To go from 75.5% of the vote to 18.2% in nine years is remarkable indeed.

Southchurch

Vote share in Southchurch ward, 2001 - 2012

Vote share in Southchurch ward, 2001 – 2012

It could be that Cllr Brian Kelly decides to call it a day next year, at the end of his mayoral year, when he is up for re-election in Southchurch ward. If he decides to carry on he will likely be involved in quite a scrap to hold this ward. Looking at the polling in recent it is clear that this is a Conservative/Independent marginal, excepting in the General Election year (2010) when Indie voices were lost in the great national debate.

The gap in 2012 was just 2% between the Tories and the Indies, and I anticipate a difficult year in 2014 for the Tories (and one can glimpse the reasons why the local blues are so keen on all-ups for 2015). This was the second most marginal ward in the town in 2012.

In 2001 Labour were less than 8% away from success, although that is still some distance away. The story of our decline since has two causes: we governed for much of the period nationally and this always makes local elections difficult, and the large number of candidates splits the anti-Tory vote.

Independent success will depend on who they select as their candidate, and that candidate’s ability to campaign. Next year should see the local elections coincide with the European elections, a national election, and Independent voices could lose themselves in the national conversation about the EU. It will be a fascinating seat to watch. One thing is certain and that this once very safe Tory seat is now one they have to work hard to hold on to.

The Festival of (hot) Air

The Spring 2012 edition of Outlook magazine (produced by Southend-on-Sea Borough Council) includes some words on that year’s (at the time) impending air festival:

Outlook magazine, Spring 2012

Outlook magazine, Spring 2012

ONE of Europe’s largest free air spectaculars is all set for take off again in the Borough. Hundreds of thousands of spectators are expected to pack along two miles of seafront …. It will be the 27th year that Southend-on-Sea has staged the huge two-day event which regular attracts up to half a million people.

The Spring 2011 edition includes the following:

Outlook magazine, Spring 2011

Outlook magazine, Spring 2011

AROUND half a million people are expected at the 26th annual Southend Air Festival …. At one of Europe’s largest free airshows.

I understand why the decision to stop contributing towards the airshow was made (Southend Labour has called for this in previous years – see No more taxpayers’ cash for airshow says Labour) but what amazes me is that in the years that we argued for the money to be spent elsewhere we were told that it contributes up to £1million to the local economy.

As recently as 2011 it was reported (Southend Air Show to continue despite council cuts:

Derek Jarvis, Tory councillor responsible for culture and tourism, is sure the show will go on.

He said: “There are so many people who enjoy it. I do not think stopping it would be an option.

“Obviously it’s not possible to know what might happen in future years, but we have already started planning for next year’s event. I cannot see any changes in the foreseeable future.”

Anita Thornberry, the council’s head of enterprise, said: “Although the council has made a loss on the event in recent years, it benefits traders by bringing hundreds of thousands of people into Southend.

“The financial loss to the authority is outweighed by the positive effect the airshow has on the town’s tourist economy.”

Cllr Tony Cox has written on the airshow over the years:

2011 … was fortunate enough to visit both days of the Southend Airshow and what a fantastic event it was … This was the 26th Airshow and hopefully still going strong.

2013 … many businesses have privately over the years said to me that they do not need the Airshow as they will busy anyway due to it being a bank holiday weekend.

Why no mention of this when Labour was calling for this cut in previous years?

Cllr James Courtenay also claimed: … this year’s Airshow, a big thing not only for our residents but our local economy

One could say the local Tories are inconsistent, one could say that they have misled the town’s residents.

The ruling administration will not enjoy reading the comments attached to the Save Southend Airshow petition.

West Shoebury

WShoeburyI represent a marginal ward. Sixty-eight votes separated me from the second-placed Conservative candidate last May; I know I am in for a tough fight when my re-election campaign arrives.

West Shoebury has not been a marginal in the past, but with only seventy-three votes separating the Conservatives and UKIP at the last election perhaps it now is. Since 2014 sees the local elections being held on the same day as the European elections one can see a banana skin awaiting Cllr Tony Cox.

Tony is a seasoned campaigner, and I have been of the opinion that he would be able to see off UKIP and hold his seat. I thought it would be close, but I thought he would do it. I am now beginning to have doubts, and these doubts have come about because of UKIP’s strong polling. Ignore the recent 17% – a rogue poll if ever there was one. But they are consistently nip and tuck with the Liberal Democrats at the moment on about 10%, and clearly are performing above expectations in by-elections. UKIP’s zenith is always the European elections, and 2014 could see them winners nationally based on vote share. Against this backdrop it could be very tricky indeed for Tony.

However, West Shoebury Conservatives will be better organised than UKIP, and with three councillors should mount an effective campaign. Nonetheless, I do throw in a couple of spoilers.

As Gray Sergeant (Labour candidate in West Shoebury last year) is acutely aware, you can fight an effective campaign and the voters can ignore you. Tony may daydream on his own personal popularity, but when realism takes hold he will acknowledge that it is usually what is dominating the national news that governs what happens at elections. Cllr Cox is not yet a national figure.

The other thing that should trouble Tony is that between 2003 and 2013 the Tory vote in West Shoebury (in vote share terms) has almost halved (from 69.0% to 37.1%). It is easy to see where their votes has gone if you look at the table here – since 2003 we have seen a proliferation of minor parties stand (seven candidates in 2006 and 2010). Whilst these minor parties shared the protest vote in the past, it looks like they are coalescing behind UKIP at the moment.

In the end the Conservatives may be saved by the European elections as UKIP activists will have to chase votes everywhere in an attempt to get as many sent to Brussels as possible. They will have to spread their campaign into areas where they would not normally go, and time spent there will time not spent in West Shoebury.

Kursaal

% vote share in Kursaal for the three main parties 2001-2012

% vote share in Kursaal for the three main parties 2001-2012

Kursaal ward is considered pretty safe Labour territory normally, but has elected Tories on two occasions into the council chamber at Southend-on-Sea Borough Council. These occurred in 2008 and 2010, and one can only imagine that if there had been elections in 2009 then they would have had the hat-trick.

The numbers since have shown the Tories returning to normality, but Labour has yet to hit the high tide marks they achieved in 2001-2003.

The Liberal Democrats came fifth last year, a last place. This ward has never looked like returning one of their number.

As in most wards in Southend-on-Sea there has been a plethora of minor party candidates in recent years, none looking likely to get elected. Third place last year went to the English Democrats who attracted 16.9% of the vote.

As for next year? Tory councillor Louise Burdett will have her work cut out to retain this seat, and whilst not impossible I think it highly unlikely.

Democracy in Southend, alive if a little offended

Democracy comes in many shapes and sizes. That some systems are more democratic than others seems obvious to me. I do accept that my preferred democratic model does not match everyone’s preferences. I prefer elections at all levels of administration, and want proportional representation. I would also widen the franchise.

I would not claim that democratic models that do not meet my preferences are not democratic.

Saxon King in Priory Park is a local pressure group, set up initially in response to the Saxon finds in Priory Crescent in Southend-on-Sea. They evolved from the remnants of the Camp Bling organisation that successfully campaigned against the road widening in Priory Crescent. I share some common ground insofar that I too have a strong environmentalist streak running through me.

However, I do not agree with everything they do, far from it. Their latest statement includes a line that is blatantly wrong: “… to highlight the lack of democracy in local government and the fact that the voice of ordinary people is ignored.

I am a member of the Electoral Reform Society – I want an improved democracy. It is wrong, though, to suggest that there is no democracy. I sit in council because I managed to get enough people to vote for me. This is democracy. It is not perfect, but it is democratic.

Ordinary people are not ignored, not by me anyway (or by my Labour colleagues). I cannot vouch for all of Southend’s councillors, but since we all depend on the consent of the people it would be extremely short-sighted to do anything but listen and respond. However, listening does not mean necessarily agreeing, if for no other reason than that we sometimes get conflicting opinions.

At the recent council meeting I was the only councillor to refer to the incident mentioned in SKIPP’s latest announcement. Since, though, a number of other councillors have waded into the fray.

I have called for a public apology from the council, and for the security team to be spoken to in the hope that this incident not be repeated. Insofar as democracy is not just about votes, but also about freedom of speech, then this incident is an affront to democracy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,961 other followers