All-up elections – what the calendar would look like

One of the arguments for all-up elections for Southend-on-Sea Borough Council is the cost savings it delivers. This is said to be especially so when they coincide with national elections.

European Parliamentary elections are held every five years and, since we now have fixed-termed Parliaments, so are General Elections. All-up local elections would occur every four years. Thus, we can look and see what savings would be made.

Assuming that we start the all-up cycle in 2015 we would next see coincidence with a national election in 2019. The next three sets of local elections would stand on their own, and so the next time we would see these savings would be in 2035. In fact, looking at the calendar (below) we can see that most elections will be on their own; so much for those savings. Still, anything to keep the Tories in power …..

GE EU All-ups
2014 EU
2015 GE All-ups
2016
2017
2018
2019 EU All-ups
2020 GE
2021
2022
2023 All-ups
2024 EU
2025 GE
2026
2027 All-ups
2028
2029 EU
2030 GE
2031 All-ups
2032
2033
2034 EU
2035 GE All-ups
2036
2037
2038
2039 EU All-ups
2040 GE
2041
2042
2043 All-ups
2044 EU
2045 GE
2046
2047 All-ups
2048
2049 EU
2050 GE
2051 All-ups
2052
2053 EU
2054
About these ads

4 Responses to All-up elections – what the calendar would look like

  1. Rob Brown says:

    The years without elections would also be savings, no?

    But this should be a debate about democracy anyway.

  2. iangilbert says:

    I don’t think you’ve got this quite right. Where we would save most is in the years where there need not be elections at all, eg 2016. When the two elections take place at the same time we save because the council doesn’t have to bear the whole cost.

  3. They would, but all-ups would be more expensive as a one-off that an election by thirds (if only for all the extra paper produced). However, it should be a debate about democracy – and since we are not going to see proportional representation for these all-ups they will be less democratic than our current electoral cycle. This is because small margins are grossly rewarded. For instance:

    Lab candidate 1 35%
    Lab candidate 2 33%
    Lab candidate 3 31%
    Con candidate 4 30%
    Con candidate 5 29%
    Con candidate 6 28%
    etc

    For an average lead of 4% Lab would get all three seats, when proportionally they should only get one (or two depending on how the rest of the candidates did).

  4. I vaguely recall the savings being quite modest (about £70000 a year). However, although turnout is often below a third regular elections do allow residents to pass opinion on the performance of their council and its councillors. It is possible to change the administration in three out of every four years at present, whereas going to all-up elections locks the chamber down for four years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,962 other followers

%d bloggers like this: